Created 10 Oct 2003; last modified 14 June 2004.

SIPR Calcutta 2004 Abstract

“Good” Violence versus “Bad” —
A Girardian analysis of King Janamejaya’s Snake Sacrifice

Barbara Mikolajewska
Warsaw University
E-mail: bmikolajewska @ usa.net
in cooperation with
F.E.J. Linton
Wesleyan University

If we try to understand the significance of the vindictive curse cast upon the Sacrificial Fire by the vengeful sage Bhrgu, and of its consequences — if we seek to grasp the meaning of the circumstances surrounding the birth of the great bird Garuda, his struggle against his snake siblings, his successful quest for the divine Soma, and his conflict and ultimate accommodation with Indra — and if we examine the vicious Snake Sacrifice of King Janamejaya, how these prior events led up to it, and how it is surprisingly aborted — we find ourselves in the presence of metaphors and imagery whose content is not easy to grasp.

We shall argue, following the well-developed complex of insights that René Girard has developed in his extensive studies on violence and the sacred, that everywhere their focus is on the differentiation of “bad” violence from “good,” and on the necessity to block the “bad” violence of uncontrolled reprisal (which Girard’s mimetic theory describes as part of a mimetic cycle of desire, rivalry, revenge, and retribution) by means of the controlled “good” violence of sacred ritual sacrifice — which, alas, despite religion’s meticulous care to distinguish the good from the bad, can all too easily degenerate, thanks to the mimetic mechanism Girard has uncovered, into “bad” violence all over again.
 

See the full text of the work outlined above.