C.M.S. • Fredericton, NB • June 2010
Meditations on Arens Multiplication
F.E.J. Linton • Wesleyan Univ. Math/CS Emeritus
In a monoidal setting, there’s a ⊗‡:
<X**, Y**, ..., Z**> →
(X ⊗ Y ⊗ ... ⊗ Z)**
arising from the universal multilinear ⊗:
< X, Y, ..., Z> →
X ⊗ Y ⊗ ... ⊗ Z
and, when μ:
<X, Y, ..., Z> → A,
we have (naturality in A) μ‡ =
μ** · ⊗‡:
<X**, Y**, ..., Z**> →
(X ⊗ Y ⊗ ... ⊗ Z)**
→ A**.
One may also view ⊗‡ and μ‡ as maps
X** ⊗ Y** ⊗ ... ⊗ Z** →
(X ⊗ Y ⊗ ... ⊗ Z)**
and
X** ⊗ Y** ⊗ ... ⊗ Z**
→ A**
— i.e., Arens’s work exhibits monoidal structure on ** .
In a symmetric monoidal setting, one can ask: is ** symmetric monoidal? That is,
where τAB:
A⊗B → B⊗A
denote the symmetry isomorphisms, and μ: A⊗B → C is given,
will ((μ·τBA):
B⊗A → A⊗B →
C)‡·τA**B**:
A**⊗B** → B**⊗A** → C**
=
μ‡: A**⊗B** → C**?
Particularly, focussing only on ⊗: <A, B>
→ A⊗B (and abusing notation), have we
((⊗·τBA)‡·τA**B**:
A**⊗B** → B**⊗A** → (A⊗B)**
=
⊗‡: A**⊗B** → (A⊗B)**?
Or, when A = B and μ · τAA = μ, have we
μ‡·(τA**A**) = μ‡?
What if C = A as well, and μ makes A a (commutative) monoid?
— “It depends ... :”
Yes, if A = C(X) (X
KT2) in Ban1.